Immigrants from Asia vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,029,156 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.174. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($99,933 compared to $73,509, a difference of 35.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $81,531, a difference of 35.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $86,595, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $48,603, a difference of 16.0%), and median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $35,864, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 51.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 46.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 12.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 19.1%), and single father poverty (14.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 41.5%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 33.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.75%), family households (66.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 13.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 61.3%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 58.5%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.31%), 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 54.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 48.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.7%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.9%).