Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Liberia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,579,830 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.486. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Liberia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 2.5 Immigrants from Liberia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $80,863, a difference of 37.0%), median household income ($99,933 compared to $74,896, a difference of 33.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $87,739, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $37,970, a difference of 16.4%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $47,981, a difference of 17.5%), and median earnings ($53,310 compared to $42,923, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 52.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 43.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.0%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 55.4%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 40.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.090%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (66.1% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 63.0%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 60.4%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 39.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 30.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.2%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 11.1%).