Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,170,129 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to an increase of 4.0 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 28.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $92,208, a difference of 26.4%), and median family income ($118,291 compared to $94,665, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $54,714, a difference of 3.0%), median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $39,910, a difference of 10.7%), and median earnings ($53,310 compared to $45,532, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 60.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 54.6%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.3%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 30.3%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.7%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.75%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.36, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 137.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 73.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 20.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 45.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 61.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.9%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.0%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 24.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.1%), male disability (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.9%).