Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Armenia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,667,321 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Immigrants from Armenia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to an increase of 38.9 Immigrants from Armenia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 30.1%), householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $53,974, a difference of 25.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $94,863, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $52,986, a difference of 6.4%), median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $40,340, a difference of 9.6%), and per capita income ($49,741 compared to $44,552, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 46.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 43.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (18.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.59%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (14.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 39.1%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 71.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 12.9%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.35, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.18%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 40.9%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 38.3%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 76.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.76%, a difference of 40.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.7%).