Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Eritrea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,711,944 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.073. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Eritrea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Immigrants from Eritrea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 25.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $97,373, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $93,466, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $41,485, a difference of 6.5%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $51,574, a difference of 9.3%), and per capita income ($49,741 compared to $44,509, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 33.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 33.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.41%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.0%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.83%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (66.1% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.20%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.7%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.7%).