Immigrants from Guyana vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,640,855 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Immigrant from Guyana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guyana within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guyana corresponds to an increase of 3.1 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 53.7%), per capita income ($40,742 compared to $57,953, a difference of 42.2%), and median family income ($92,513 compared to $126,620, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,726 compared to $56,660, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($40,773 compared to $46,573, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,495 compared to $69,164, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 84.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 51.8%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.3%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 44.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.3% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 28.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 48.5%), births to unmarried women (35.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 31.3%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (65.5% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 113.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 71.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 22.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.0% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 49.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 60.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 110.0%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 88.4%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 78.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.0%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.0%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.5%).