Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,812,322 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,910 compared to $57,953, a difference of 66.0%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $126,620, a difference of 61.8%), and median male earnings ($43,461 compared to $67,634, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $56,660, a difference of 12.5%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 26.2%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $46,573, a difference of 39.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 127.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 70.6%), and married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 70.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.89%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 55.7%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 47.8%), and divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.0%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (44.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 58.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 138.1%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 92.2%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 92.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.4%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.0%).