Immigrants from Canada vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,617,548 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.758. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.289% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to an increase of 289.0 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,412 compared to $57,953, a difference of 17.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,616 compared to $115,947, a difference of 13.0%), and median family income ($112,374 compared to $126,620, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.91%), householder income under 25 years ($53,411 compared to $56,660, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,952 compared to $69,164, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.050%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 14.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.33%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 58.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.3%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 24.4%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.46%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.1%).