Fijian vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,431,526 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $57,953, a difference of 58.0%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $67,634, a difference of 48.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $115,947, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $56,660, a difference of 13.0%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $69,164, a difference of 21.8%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 42.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 35.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.25%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 37.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 51.9%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 41.3%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.0%), currently married (46.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.13, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 45.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 148.2%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 135.9%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 102.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 36.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 28.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 7.9%).