Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,153,676 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.747. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to an increase of 53.3 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,563 compared to $57,953, a difference of 36.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,969 compared to $115,947, a difference of 28.9%), and median family income ($99,591 compared to $126,620, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.94%), householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $56,660, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,447 compared to $69,164, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 24.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 24.1%), and single male poverty (14.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and male poverty (11.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 24.9%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.66%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and currently married (48.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 103.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 60.5%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 49.3%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 47.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 34.1%), and hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.47%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.9%).