Immigrants from Europe vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,510,323 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Immigrant from Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Europe corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,950 compared to $57,953, a difference of 13.8%), median family income ($115,523 compared to $126,620, a difference of 9.6%), and median male earnings ($62,057 compared to $67,634, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,022 compared to $56,660, a difference of 3.0%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,984 compared to $119,308, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), female poverty (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.33%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.3%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and family households (63.7% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.75%), currently married (48.1% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 10.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.35%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.3%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.6%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.91%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.9%).