Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,331,066 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Dutch West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.914. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.174% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch West Indians corresponds to an increase of 173.9 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,922 compared to $57,953, a difference of 61.3%), median family income ($81,852 compared to $126,620, a difference of 54.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,171 compared to $119,308, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,816 compared to $56,660, a difference of 23.7%), and median female earnings ($34,106 compared to $46,573, a difference of 36.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 59.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 57.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 17.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 44.3%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.4%), married-couple households (44.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 23.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 122.9%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 110.4%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 96.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 66.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 61.7%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.9%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.6%).