Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,552,680 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.025. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,152 compared to $57,953, a difference of 44.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $115,947, a difference of 37.7%), and median family income ($93,748 compared to $126,620, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $56,660, a difference of 16.4%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $46,573, a difference of 21.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,615 compared to $69,164, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 53.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 45.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 5.1%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 53.3%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 37.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 1.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 68.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 58.7%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 30.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.1%).