Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Australia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Congo

Immigrants from Australia

Fair
Excellent
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,900
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
40th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Australia Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,261,462 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 6.7 Immigrants from Australia.
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Immigrants from Australia Communities

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,720 compared to $57,953, a difference of 62.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $115,947, a difference of 60.6%), and median family income ($82,216 compared to $126,620, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 30.1%), householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $56,660, a difference of 31.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $69,164, a difference of 34.6%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Australia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,720
Exceptional
$57,953
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,216
Exceptional
$126,620
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,768
Exceptional
$102,562
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,169
Exceptional
$56,305
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,204
Exceptional
$67,634
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,317
Exceptional
$46,573
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$43,266
Exceptional
$56,660
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,178
Exceptional
$115,947
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$77,850
Exceptional
$119,308
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,393
Exceptional
$69,164
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
28.2%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 65.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 63.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.9%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.5%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Australia
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
7.6%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.4%
Exceptional
13.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Australia
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Average
17.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 18.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Australia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Tragic
35.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Good
82.9%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 59.4%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 38.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.3%), family households (59.2% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.0%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Australia
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Tragic
61.3%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.0%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.1%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
26.6%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 37.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 0.61%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.5%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Australia
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Tragic
13.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Tragic
86.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.1%
Tragic
52.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
18.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 89.5%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 75.8%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.74%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Australia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Exceptional
72.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Exceptional
67.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Exceptional
55.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Exceptional
48.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
20.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
6.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.8%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 37.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Australia
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.7%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%