Swiss vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,865,259 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.493. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to a decrease of 6.1 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,076 compared to $57,953, a difference of 31.5%), median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $46,573, a difference of 22.9%), and median earnings ($46,315 compared to $56,305, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $56,660, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $69,164, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 14.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.24%), male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 23.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.1%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 14.5%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.79%), currently married (49.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 76.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 54.2%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 42.0%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.11%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 40.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.6%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.4%).