Romanian vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Yakama

Excellent
Poor
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,348,947 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 42.4 Yakama.
Romanian Integration in Yakama Communities

Romanian vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $33,009, a difference of 46.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,544 compared to $76,226, a difference of 34.5%), and median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $45,002, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $54,321, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $56,234, a difference of 14.1%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 17.7%).
Romanian vs Yakama Income
Income MetricRomanianYakama
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
23.7%

Romanian vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 105.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 85.2%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.6%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 27.6%), and single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 30.7%).
Romanian vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianYakama
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
21.4%

Romanian vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 105.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 88.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 83.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.2%).
Romanian vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianYakama
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
8.1%

Romanian vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Romanian vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianYakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
80.6%

Romanian vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 97.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 49.4%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.7%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and family households (64.5% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Romanian vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianYakama
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
40.3%

Romanian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 108.8%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 65.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 60.5%).
Romanian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianYakama
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
12.9%

Romanian vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 99.5%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 81.5%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 71.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Romanian vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianYakama
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.3%

Romanian vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 35.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 34.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 11.0%).
Romanian vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricRomanianYakama
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%