Romanian vs Yakama Community Comparison
COMPARE
Romanian
Yakama
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Romanians
Yakama
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Yakama Integration in Romanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,348,947 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 42.4 Yakama.
Romanian vs Yakama Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $33,009, a difference of 46.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,544 compared to $76,226, a difference of 34.5%), and median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $45,002, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $54,321, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $56,234, a difference of 14.1%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 17.7%).
Income Metric | Romanian | Yakama |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $48,445 | Tragic $33,009 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $111,243 | Tragic $83,932 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,994 | Tragic $72,225 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,244 | Tragic $39,107 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,063 | Tragic $45,002 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,663 | Tragic $33,354 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,632 | Exceptional $54,321 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $102,544 | Tragic $76,226 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $108,609 | Tragic $86,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,142 | Tragic $56,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Exceptional 23.7% |
Romanian vs Yakama Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 105.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 85.2%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.6%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 27.6%), and single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 30.7%).
Poverty Metric | Romanian | Yakama |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 25.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 17.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 22.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 21.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.6% | Tragic 28.3% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 14.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 21.4% |
Romanian vs Yakama Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 105.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 88.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 83.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Romanian | Yakama |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Tragic 22.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 8.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 8.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 18.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 8.1% |
Romanian vs Yakama Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Romanian | Yakama |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 65.0% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.8% | Tragic 75.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Good 36.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Average 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 80.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 80.6% |
Romanian vs Yakama Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 97.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 49.4%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.7%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and family households (64.5% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Romanian | Yakama |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Exceptional 69.3% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 30.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 45.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Exceptional 3.45 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 8.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 44.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 40.3% |
Romanian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 108.8%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 65.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 60.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Romanian | Yakama |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Exceptional 6.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 93.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.5% | Exceptional 64.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 31.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Romanian vs Yakama Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 99.5%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 81.5%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 71.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Education Level Metric | Romanian | Yakama |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 95.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Tragic 94.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 91.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 90.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Tragic 86.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Tragic 85.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 82.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 80.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Tragic 74.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.2% | Tragic 52.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.4% | Tragic 46.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.7% | Tragic 32.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.6% | Tragic 24.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.2% | Tragic 9.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Romanian vs Yakama Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 35.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 34.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 11.0%).
Disability Metric | Romanian | Yakama |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Exceptional 1.00% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 29.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 51.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |