Chilean vs Yakama Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
Yakama
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
Yakama
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Yakama Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,102,542 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.500. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.171% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 170.7 Yakama.
Chilean vs Yakama Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $33,009, a difference of 40.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $76,226, a difference of 31.1%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $83,932, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $54,321, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $56,234, a difference of 13.7%).
Income Metric | Chilean | Yakama |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Tragic $33,009 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Tragic $83,932 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Tragic $72,225 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Tragic $39,107 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Tragic $45,002 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Tragic $33,354 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Exceptional $54,321 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Tragic $76,226 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Tragic $86,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Tragic $56,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 23.7% |
Chilean vs Yakama Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 95.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 81.2%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.4%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 30.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 32.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | Yakama |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 16.7% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 25.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 17.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 22.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 21.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 28.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Tragic 14.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 21.4% |
Chilean vs Yakama Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 118.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 90.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 88.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | Yakama |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 22.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 8.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 8.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 18.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 8.1% |
Chilean vs Yakama Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | Yakama |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 75.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Good 36.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Average 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 80.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 80.6% |
Chilean vs Yakama Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 88.9%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 37.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.9%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households (65.2% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 6.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | Yakama |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 69.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 30.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Tragic 45.2% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.45 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 8.4% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 44.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Tragic 40.3% |
Chilean vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 102.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 57.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 49.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | Yakama |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 6.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Exceptional 93.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Exceptional 64.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 31.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Chilean vs Yakama Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 79.0%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 74.1%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 70.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | Yakama |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Tragic 3.6% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Tragic 96.6% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 96.4% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Tragic 95.9% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Tragic 95.2% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Tragic 94.3% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Tragic 91.2% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Tragic 90.1% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Tragic 86.9% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Tragic 85.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Tragic 82.5% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Tragic 80.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 74.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Tragic 52.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Tragic 46.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 32.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Tragic 24.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 9.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Chilean vs Yakama Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 42.6%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 37.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.5%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.6%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | Yakama |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Exceptional 1.00% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 29.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 51.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |