Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Yakama
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Yakama
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Yakama Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,564,607 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.884. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.356% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 356.3 Yakama.
Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $33,009, a difference of 32.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $76,226, a difference of 24.7%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $45,002, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $54,321, a difference of 6.0%), householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $56,234, a difference of 7.7%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $33,354, a difference of 16.1%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Yakama |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Tragic $33,009 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Tragic $83,932 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Tragic $72,225 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Tragic $39,107 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Tragic $45,002 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Tragic $33,354 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Exceptional $54,321 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Tragic $76,226 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Tragic $86,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Tragic $56,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 23.7% |
Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 108.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 105.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 68.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.2%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.0%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 22.4%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Yakama |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 18.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Tragic 25.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 17.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 22.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 21.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 15.9% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Tragic 28.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 14.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 18.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 21.4% |
Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 95.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 94.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 80.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Yakama |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.3% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 15.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 22.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Tragic 8.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 8.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 18.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.1% |
Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Yakama |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Tragic 75.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Good 36.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Average 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 80.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 80.6% |
Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 80.2%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 42.9%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.39%), family households (64.6% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Yakama |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Exceptional 69.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 30.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 45.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Exceptional 3.45 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 8.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Tragic 44.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Tragic 40.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 81.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 42.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Yakama |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 6.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 64.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 31.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 119.1%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 53.4%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Yakama |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 3.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 95.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 95.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 94.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 91.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 90.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Tragic 86.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 85.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 82.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 80.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Tragic 74.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Tragic 52.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 46.2% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Tragic 32.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Tragic 9.5% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Yakama Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 51.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.8%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Yakama |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.00% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 13.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Tragic 29.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Tragic 51.3% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.7% |