Hopi vs Yakama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 8,694,915 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Hopi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hopi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hopi corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Yakama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hopi and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 18.7%), householder income under 25 years ($46,978 compared to $54,321, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,562 compared to $86,992, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,002 compared to $76,226, a difference of 1.6%), median female earnings ($33,932 compared to $33,354, a difference of 1.7%), and per capita income ($31,177 compared to $33,009, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hopi and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (27.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 72.6%), single father poverty (27.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 49.9%), and male poverty (20.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (21.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.63%), single female poverty (28.0% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.90%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hopi and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 193.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (16.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 153.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hopi and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (66.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (76.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hopi and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.0%), births to unmarried women (50.8% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and married-couple households (36.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.75%), average family size (3.60 compared to 3.45, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (65.3% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 107.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 88.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 70.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 8.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 70.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hopi and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 59.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.3%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.6% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 363.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.5%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.1%).