Slavic vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Slavs

Yakama

Good
Poor
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in Slavic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,981,236 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.801. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.079% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 78.6 Yakama.
Slavic Integration in Yakama Communities

Slavic vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,049 compared to $33,009, a difference of 36.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $76,226, a difference of 26.4%), and median male earnings ($56,390 compared to $45,002, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $54,321, a difference of 7.4%), householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $56,234, a difference of 9.7%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 15.5%).
Slavic vs Yakama Income
Income MetricSlavicYakama
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,049
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Good
$105,144
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Good
$86,398
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,470
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,390
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,613
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,563
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,377
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,629
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,709
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
23.7%

Slavic vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 101.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 101.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.4%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 20.0%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 23.1%).
Slavic vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricSlavicYakama
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.0%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
21.4%

Slavic vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 101.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 88.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 76.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.3%).
Slavic vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSlavicYakama
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
8.1%

Slavic vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Slavic vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSlavicYakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
80.6%

Slavic vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 86.2%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 43.4%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.75%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households (64.0% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 8.3%).
Slavic vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSlavicYakama
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Tragic
40.3%

Slavic vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 97.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 51.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.4%).
Slavic vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSlavicYakama
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.2%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
12.9%

Slavic vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 115.3%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 63.8%), and bachelor's degree (38.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Slavic vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricSlavicYakama
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.7%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.7%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.6%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.9%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%

Slavic vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 40.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 29.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.2%).
Slavic vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricSlavicYakama
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%