Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Community Comparison
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Yakama
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Yakama
7,850
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
101st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Yakama Integration in Indian (Asian) Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,471,595 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.272. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Yakama.
Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $33,009, a difference of 63.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $76,226, a difference of 56.8%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $83,932, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $54,321, a difference of 7.2%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $56,234, a difference of 24.9%).
Income Metric | Indian (Asian) | Yakama |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $53,874 | Tragic $33,009 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,312 | Tragic $83,932 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,262 | Tragic $72,225 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,253 | Tragic $39,107 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $66,078 | Tragic $45,002 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,481 | Tragic $33,354 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,239 | Exceptional $54,321 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,496 | Tragic $76,226 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,343 | Tragic $86,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $70,238 | Tragic $56,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Exceptional 23.7% |
Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 122.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 85.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 72.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 22.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 29.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 33.4%).
Poverty Metric | Indian (Asian) | Yakama |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.6% | Tragic 25.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 17.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 22.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 21.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 17.9% | Tragic 28.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.8% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Tragic 14.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 18.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 21.4% |
Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 131.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 90.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 80.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Indian (Asian) | Yakama |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 7.3% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 15.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Tragic 22.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 8.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 8.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 18.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.1% |
Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Indian (Asian) | Yakama |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Tragic 75.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.9% | Good 36.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.9% | Average 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.7% | Tragic 80.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 80.6% |
Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 119.6%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 64.7%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.45, a difference of 6.2%), family households (65.1% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Indian (Asian) | Yakama |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.1% | Exceptional 69.3% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 30.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 45.2% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Exceptional 3.45 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.0% | Tragic 44.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 25.3% | Tragic 40.3% |
Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 112.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 101.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 22.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 62.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Indian (Asian) | Yakama |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 6.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.1% | Exceptional 64.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 31.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 126.8%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 116.1%), and professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 111.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Indian (Asian) | Yakama |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 96.6% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 96.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 95.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 95.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 94.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Tragic 91.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Tragic 90.1% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Tragic 86.9% |
11th Grade | Average 92.5% | Tragic 85.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 82.5% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Tragic 80.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 74.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.8% | Tragic 52.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 46.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.8% | Tragic 32.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 47.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.5% | Tragic 9.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.9% | Tragic 1.3% |
Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 61.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 53.1%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 0.28%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 10.2%).
Disability Metric | Indian (Asian) | Yakama |
Disability | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Exceptional 1.00% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.9% | Tragic 13.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.5% | Tragic 29.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 51.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |