Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Indian (Asian)
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Indians (Asian)

Yakama

Good
Poor
7,850
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
101st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in Indian (Asian) Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,471,595 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.272. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Yakama.
Indian (Asian) Integration in Yakama Communities

Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $33,009, a difference of 63.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $76,226, a difference of 56.8%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $83,932, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $54,321, a difference of 7.2%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $56,234, a difference of 24.9%).
Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Income
Income MetricIndian (Asian)Yakama
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$53,874
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,312
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,262
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,253
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$66,078
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,481
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,239
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,496
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,343
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$70,238
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Exceptional
23.7%

Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 122.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 85.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 72.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 22.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 29.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 33.4%).
Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricIndian (Asian)Yakama
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.6%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.9%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.8%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
21.4%

Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 131.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 90.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 80.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.6%).
Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIndian (Asian)Yakama
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.2%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
8.1%

Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.1%).
Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIndian (Asian)Yakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.9%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.9%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
80.6%

Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 119.6%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 64.7%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.45, a difference of 6.2%), family households (65.1% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.7%).
Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIndian (Asian)Yakama
Family Households
Exceptional
65.1%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.0%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
25.3%
Tragic
40.3%

Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 112.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 101.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 22.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 62.1%).
Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIndian (Asian)Yakama
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.1%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
12.9%

Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 126.8%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 116.1%), and professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 111.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricIndian (Asian)Yakama
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.8%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.8%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
47.4%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.9%
Tragic
1.3%

Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 61.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 53.1%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 0.28%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 10.2%).
Indian (Asian) vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricIndian (Asian)Yakama
Disability
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.9%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%