Black/African American vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,704,260 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Black/African American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blacks/African Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blacks/African Americans corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Taiwanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Black/African American and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($73,370 compared to $101,492, a difference of 38.3%), median household income ($67,573 compared to $89,900, a difference of 33.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,556 compared to $104,180, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,381 compared to $49,804, a difference of 12.2%), median female earnings ($35,315 compared to $40,576, a difference of 14.9%), and wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Black/African American and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (25.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 77.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (24.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 68.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (24.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 14.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Black/African American and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 76.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 69.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Black/African American and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.5% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Black/African American and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 56.1%), births to unmarried women (44.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 52.8%), and married-couple households (38.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (61.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Black/African American and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.26%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Black/African American and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 46.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.2%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Black/African American and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 49.4%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 44.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (19.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.9%).