Swedish vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Swedes

Taiwanese

Excellent
Good
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Taiwanese Integration in Swedish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,710,830 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.436. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 25.1 Taiwanese.
Swedish Integration in Taiwanese Communities

Swedish vs Taiwanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 17.0%), householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $49,804, a difference of 6.4%), and median male earnings ($57,445 compared to $55,556, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,851 compared to $47,902, a difference of 0.11%), householder income over 65 years ($62,736 compared to $62,894, a difference of 0.25%), and median family income ($108,499 compared to $107,295, a difference of 1.1%).
Swedish vs Taiwanese Income
Income MetricSwedishTaiwanese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,750
Exceptional
$46,455
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,499
Exceptional
$107,295
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,524
Exceptional
$89,900
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,851
Excellent
$47,902
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,445
Good
$55,556
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,421
Excellent
$40,576
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,986
Tragic
$49,804
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,136
Exceptional
$101,492
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,377
Excellent
$104,180
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,736
Excellent
$62,894
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.4%
Excellent
25.1%

Swedish vs Taiwanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 27.6%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 3.2%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 5.7%).
Swedish vs Taiwanese Poverty
Poverty MetricSwedishTaiwanese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Good
12.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Good
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.4%
Exceptional
27.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Excellent
11.0%

Swedish vs Taiwanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 52.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 33.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Swedish vs Taiwanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSwedishTaiwanese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
15.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%

Swedish vs Taiwanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 30.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
Swedish vs Taiwanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSwedishTaiwanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
44.1%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.8%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Exceptional
83.4%

Swedish vs Taiwanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in currently married (50.0% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 9.1%), married-couple households (49.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.8%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Swedish vs Taiwanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSwedishTaiwanese
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.7%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.0%
Poor
45.8%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Exceptional
29.0%

Swedish vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 71.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 5.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 14.8%).
Swedish vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSwedishTaiwanese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.8%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Excellent
20.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.0%

Swedish vs Taiwanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 77.2%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Swedish vs Taiwanese Education Level
Education Level MetricSwedishTaiwanese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
94.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
93.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
91.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.7%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.8%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.7%
Good
66.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Excellent
47.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
39.1%
Exceptional
40.0%
Master's Degree
Good
15.2%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%

Swedish vs Taiwanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 5.4%).
Swedish vs Taiwanese Disability
Disability MetricSwedishTaiwanese
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%