Belgian vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,728,735 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Belgian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.915. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belgians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.298% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belgians corresponds to an increase of 297.5 Taiwanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belgian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 14.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,262 compared to $101,492, a difference of 7.7%), and median household income ($84,008 compared to $89,900, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,361 compared to $55,556, a difference of 0.35%), householder income under 25 years ($50,113 compared to $49,804, a difference of 0.62%), and median earnings ($46,375 compared to $47,902, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belgian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 24.3%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belgian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 51.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 43.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belgian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.4% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 28.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belgian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 9.0%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.46%), family households (63.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 45.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belgian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 58.0%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (66.2% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 5.2%).