Chilean vs Taiwanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
Taiwanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
Taiwanese
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Taiwanese Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,973,770 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.101% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 100.7 Taiwanese.
Chilean vs Taiwanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $49,804, a difference of 6.8%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $55,556, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,459 compared to $46,455, a difference of 0.010%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $40,576, a difference of 0.45%), and median household income ($90,605 compared to $89,900, a difference of 0.78%).
Income Metric | Chilean | Taiwanese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Exceptional $46,455 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Exceptional $107,295 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Exceptional $89,900 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Excellent $47,902 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Good $55,556 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Excellent $40,576 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Tragic $49,804 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Exceptional $101,492 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Excellent $104,180 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Excellent $62,894 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Excellent 25.1% |
Chilean vs Taiwanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 11.2%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.61%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | Taiwanese |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Good 12.2% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 27.5% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Fair 11.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Excellent 11.0% |
Chilean vs Taiwanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | Taiwanese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Chilean vs Taiwanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.46%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | Taiwanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Tragic 33.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Fair 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chilean vs Taiwanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.4%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.020%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | Taiwanese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Poor 45.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Exceptional 29.0% |
Chilean vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | Taiwanese |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Tragic 11.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Tragic 88.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Tragic 53.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Excellent 20.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Chilean vs Taiwanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.1%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.45%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | Taiwanese |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Tragic 97.5% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Tragic 94.8% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Tragic 94.7% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Tragic 93.6% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Tragic 92.5% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Tragic 91.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Good 66.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Excellent 60.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Excellent 47.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Exceptional 40.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chilean vs Taiwanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | Taiwanese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |