Slavic vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,709,888 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.919. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.984% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 3,984.4 Taiwanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $101,492, a difference of 5.3%), and median household income ($86,398 compared to $89,900, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,470 compared to $47,902, a difference of 0.91%), median male earnings ($56,390 compared to $55,556, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $104,180, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.0%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 21.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.81%), receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 39.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 9.1%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (64.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 30.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 51.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (60.6% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 0.30%), associate's degree (47.6% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and college, under 1 year (66.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.7%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.4%).