Immigrants from Belgium vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,000,211 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.269% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to a decrease of 268.7 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,082 compared to $33,931, a difference of 62.3%), median family income ($123,831 compared to $83,639, a difference of 48.0%), and median male earnings ($66,125 compared to $44,960, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,830 compared to $50,422, a difference of 8.7%), wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,703 compared to $52,801, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 64.4%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 57.6%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.2%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and single male poverty (12.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 30.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.7%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 53.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 53.1%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 3.2%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 54.7%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 44.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 33.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 162.8%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 161.5%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 123.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 29.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.65%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.6%).