Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,161,503 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.382. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.390% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 389.8 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $33,931, a difference of 29.7%), median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $44,960, a difference of 17.6%), and median family income ($98,205 compared to $83,639, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $50,422, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $52,801, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 32.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 29.1%), and family poverty (9.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.2%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.2%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.98%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 66.3%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 46.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 43.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 72.5%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 60.8%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 20.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.1%).