Fijian vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,256,734 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.202. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.126% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 125.7 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.3%), per capita income ($36,690 compared to $33,931, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $52,801, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $84,910, a difference of 0.33%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $50,422, a difference of 0.58%), and median household income ($74,205 compared to $73,160, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 31.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 27.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 42.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 38.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 16.1%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.84%), single father households (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 46.9%), associate's degree (37.4% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and male disability (12.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.46%).