Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,405,385 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.025. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to a decrease of 20.8 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,065 compared to $33,931, a difference of 12.2%), wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $33,236, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,085 compared to $52,801, a difference of 1.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,108 compared to $84,910, a difference of 4.9%), and median household income ($76,784 compared to $73,160, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 17.9%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.97%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and female poverty (15.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.3%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (43.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (67.5% compared to 69.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 32.6%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 21.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.0%), master's degree (11.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 27.2%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.57%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.30%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.7%).