Immigrants from Cambodia vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,510,866 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.276% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to a decrease of 275.7 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,434 compared to $33,931, a difference of 19.2%), median female earnings ($38,833 compared to $33,236, a difference of 16.8%), and median family income ($97,222 compared to $83,639, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $50,422, a difference of 4.0%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,580 compared to $52,801, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.5%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 24.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 7.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.7%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.5% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.090%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 25.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 38.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.3%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.24%), male disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.53%).