Immigrants from Lebanon vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,573,565 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.420. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.203% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to a decrease of 202.8 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,938 compared to $33,931, a difference of 38.3%), median family income ($110,159 compared to $83,639, a difference of 31.7%), and median male earnings ($58,835 compared to $44,960, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,729 compared to $50,422, a difference of 0.61%), wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,521 compared to $52,801, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 37.7%), receiving food stamps (11.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 34.4%), and family poverty (9.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and single father poverty (17.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 51.3%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 48.4%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 5.2%), family households (65.5% compared to 69.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and average family size (3.30 compared to 3.52, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 42.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 24.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.31%), no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 106.5%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 103.2%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 88.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 23.6%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.9%).