Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,338,845 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.187% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 187.3 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $78,809, a difference of 31.9%), median household income ($93,933 compared to $73,160, a difference of 28.4%), and median family income ($106,544 compared to $83,639, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 12.8%), householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $50,422, a difference of 13.2%), and median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $44,960, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 46.7%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 37.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.7%), single father poverty (13.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 20.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 30.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 28.5%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.8% compared to 69.1%, a difference of 0.53%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.52, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.30%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 41.2%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.9%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.48%), disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.2%).