Central American vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,647,199 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.093. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to a decrease of 29.3 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,560 compared to $33,931, a difference of 13.6%), median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $33,236, a difference of 9.8%), and wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $50,422, a difference of 4.4%), householder income over 65 years ($56,321 compared to $52,801, a difference of 6.7%), and median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $44,960, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.4%), single female poverty (23.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.34%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.1% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 8.5%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.87%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (43.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 32.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 31.8%), and master's degree (12.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.3%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.66%), female disability (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.7%).