Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,888,725 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.425. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to a decrease of 29.2 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 53.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,347 compared to $134,910, a difference of 47.7%), and median family income ($93,988 compared to $138,397, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,437 compared to $57,740, a difference of 10.1%), median female earnings ($40,895 compared to $49,508, a difference of 21.1%), and median earnings ($45,729 compared to $61,197, a difference of 33.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 113.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 71.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 71.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.5%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 45.0%), male unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 41.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 62.0%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 58.0%), and married-couple households (41.2% compared to 51.0%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 136.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 68.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 16.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 43.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 55.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 132.7%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 94.5%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 65.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 39.4%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 37.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.2%).