Fijian vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,271,774 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.382. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 8.4 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $74,224, a difference of 62.7%), per capita income ($36,690 compared to $59,066, a difference of 61.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $128,723, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $57,740, a difference of 15.2%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 29.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $76,686, a difference of 35.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 76.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 71.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 50.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 27.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 66.6%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 53.2%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.0%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.1%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.37%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 204.4%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 158.4%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 127.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 64.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 42.1%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.9%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 13.3%).