Swiss vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,345,886 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.767. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 73.4 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($85,681 compared to $115,509, a difference of 34.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,511 compared to $128,723, a difference of 34.8%), and per capita income ($44,076 compared to $59,066, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.89%), householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $57,740, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $76,686, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 33.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 5.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.23%), male unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 36.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.6%), single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.3%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.7% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 0.020%), family households (65.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 74.1%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 68.9%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.060%), 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 55.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 44.2%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.9%).