Icelander vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,633,645 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.479. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.360% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 1,359.9 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,560 compared to $128,723, a difference of 34.7%), median household income ($85,797 compared to $115,509, a difference of 34.6%), and median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $74,224, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $57,740, a difference of 12.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $76,686, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 41.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 40.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.7%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.85%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 28.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 31.9%), single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.4%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.49%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (63.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.34%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.95%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 67.4%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 58.0%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.070%), 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 41.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 31.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.5%).