Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,992,236 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.367. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to a decrease of 20.2 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,232 compared to $128,723, a difference of 29.7%), median household income ($90,026 compared to $115,509, a difference of 28.3%), and median male earnings ($58,008 compared to $74,224, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $57,740, a difference of 8.6%), median female earnings ($42,084 compared to $49,508, a difference of 17.6%), and wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 48.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 44.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.6%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.69%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.5%), no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 62.2%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 49.4%), and master's degree (17.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.7%).