Scottish vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,934,766 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to a decrease of 21.5 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 42.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $48,535, a difference of 27.2%), and median family income ($104,288 compared to $83,319, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $50,757, a difference of 0.40%), median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $36,414, a difference of 5.4%), and median earnings ($46,463 compared to $41,119, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 98.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 79.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 73.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.3%), single female poverty (21.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.0%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.8%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 34.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 45.5%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 25.5%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.030%), family households (64.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.33, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 190.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 67.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 16.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 38.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 55.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 105.6%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 54.8%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 44.0%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.5%).