Scottish vs Immigrants from Western Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,459,057 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Africa within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.523. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.176% in Immigrants from Western Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 175.7 Immigrants from Western Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 32.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $92,384, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $85,676, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $49,621, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $39,351, a difference of 2.5%), and median earnings ($46,463 compared to $44,893, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 48.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 37.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.51%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.1%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.8%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.9%), married-couple households (49.0% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and currently married (49.2% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.1%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 121.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 24.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 33.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 82.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 15.0%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.8%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.6%).