Scottish vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,039,951 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.833. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 64.6 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 27.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $91,385, a difference of 11.7%), and per capita income ($44,440 compared to $39,827, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $38,028, a difference of 0.97%), householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $48,749, a difference of 3.7%), and median earnings ($46,463 compared to $43,998, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 41.2%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 32.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.5%), single female poverty (21.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.5%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.5%), married-couple households (49.0% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and currently married (49.2% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.1%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 54.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 122.4%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 46.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.2%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 1.9%).