Scottish vs Immigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 562,582,967 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 49.1 Immigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 16.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $53,201, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $59,656, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,463 compared to $46,478, a difference of 0.030%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $94,423, a difference of 0.21%), and median household income ($85,101 compared to $85,818, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 41.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 35.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.0%), currently married (49.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.33, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.6%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 72.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 97.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and college, under 1 year (67.0% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.51%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.3%).