Immigrants vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,575,638 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.827. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 19.3%), median female earnings ($39,328 compared to $37,904, a difference of 3.8%), and median family income ($100,962 compared to $104,396, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($85,818 compared to $85,681, a difference of 0.16%), median earnings ($46,478 compared to $46,315, a difference of 0.35%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,423 compared to $95,511, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 40.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 34.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.050%), single female poverty (21.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.2%), unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 25.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.6%), currently married (45.8% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 48.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 82.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and high school diploma (85.8% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.71%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 24.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.2%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.2%).