South African vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,774,254 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Swiss within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to an increase of 5.7 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,044 compared to $44,076, a difference of 13.5%), median female earnings ($41,825 compared to $37,904, a difference of 10.3%), and median male earnings ($61,460 compared to $55,731, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,383 compared to $51,493, a difference of 0.21%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,719 compared to $103,071, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,652 compared to $61,621, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.65%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 26.6%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.3%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.080%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.57%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.2%), master's degree (18.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.6% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.9%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.97%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.4%).