Crow vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,387,907 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 4.9 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 57.2%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $44,076, a difference of 38.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $103,071, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $37,904, a difference of 7.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $51,493, a difference of 9.5%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $46,315, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 123.1%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 108.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 92.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 30.0%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 38.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 48.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 260.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 247.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 238.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 53.2%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 32.4%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.10%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.34%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.8%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 38.7%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.020%), 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and 11th grade (92.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.4%).