Norwegian vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,434,152 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,480 compared to $39,826, a difference of 11.7%), wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and median male earnings ($55,965 compared to $51,389, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,084 compared to $86,498, a difference of 0.48%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $101,580, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $54,610, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 34.7%), married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.4%), and family poverty (6.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.29%), single female poverty (20.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.3%), female unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.6%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and average family size (3.08 compared to 3.42, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (49.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (63.9% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 67.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.38%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and male disability (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%).