Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Carpatho Rusyn
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Samoan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Carpatho Rusyns

Samoans

Good
Fair
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Samoan Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,435,968 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.291% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 290.5 Samoans.
Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Samoan Communities

Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,248 compared to $39,826, a difference of 18.6%), median male earnings ($57,572 compared to $51,389, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $54,610, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,635 compared to $86,498, a difference of 0.16%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,777 compared to $101,580, a difference of 1.2%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.0%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Income
Income MetricCarpatho RusynSamoan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,248
Tragic
$39,826
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,502
Fair
$100,344
Median Household Income
Good
$86,635
Good
$86,498
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,617
Tragic
$44,206
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,572
Tragic
$51,389
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,825
Tragic
$37,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,113
Exceptional
$54,610
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,449
Fair
$92,385
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,777
Good
$101,580
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,093
Exceptional
$65,427
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Fair
26.0%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 30.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.9%), and receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.66%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Poverty
Poverty MetricCarpatho RusynSamoan
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
12.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Good
8.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Good
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.2%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.5%
Excellent
16.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Good
15.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
13.8%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Fair
12.1%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCarpatho RusynSamoan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Average
5.4%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCarpatho RusynSamoan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Exceptional
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
87.0%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.2%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
81.8%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.1%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 17.2%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.53%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 5.6%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCarpatho RusynSamoan
Family Households
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
67.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.06
Exceptional
3.42
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Average
46.8%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Fair
32.6%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 66.7%), no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 39.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 38.4%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCarpatho RusynSamoan
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.7%
Exceptional
7.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
25.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
9.2%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 64.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 59.1%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.93%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.95%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Education Level
Education Level MetricCarpatho RusynSamoan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Fair
90.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.1%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.9%
Tragic
63.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
41.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.1%
Tragic
31.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
11.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.28%), disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.82%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Samoan Disability
Disability MetricCarpatho RusynSamoan
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
49.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%