Chilean vs Samoan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
Samoan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
Samoans
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Samoan Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,149,331 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.163% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 163.2 Samoans.
Chilean vs Samoan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $39,826, a difference of 16.7%), median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $51,389, a difference of 10.9%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $44,206, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $65,427, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $54,610, a difference of 2.7%).
Income Metric | Chilean | Samoan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Tragic $39,826 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Fair $100,344 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Good $86,498 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Tragic $44,206 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Tragic $51,389 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Tragic $37,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Exceptional $54,610 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Fair $92,385 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Good $101,580 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Exceptional $65,427 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Fair 26.0% |
Chilean vs Samoan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | Samoan |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Good 12.0% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Good 8.6% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Good 10.9% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Good 15.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Good 20.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Fair 12.1% |
Chilean vs Samoan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | Samoan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Average 5.4% |
Chilean vs Samoan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | Samoan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Exceptional 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 83.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 83.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 81.8% |
Chilean vs Samoan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.4%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | Samoan |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 67.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.42 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Average 46.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Fair 32.6% |
Chilean vs Samoan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 44.1%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 26.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | Samoan |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 7.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Exceptional 61.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 25.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Chilean vs Samoan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 58.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 51.4%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | Samoan |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Fair 90.8% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Tragic 63.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 41.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Tragic 31.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 11.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chilean vs Samoan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.3%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | Samoan |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 49.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Poor 2.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |