Swiss vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,045,536 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 47.8 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 15.4%), per capita income ($44,076 compared to $39,826, a difference of 10.7%), and median male earnings ($55,731 compared to $51,389, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($85,681 compared to $86,498, a difference of 0.95%), median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $37,498, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,071 compared to $101,580, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 25.0%), receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 24.4%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.42%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and single female poverty (21.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.7%), female unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and male unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.42, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.020%), married-couple households (49.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (65.2% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.15%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 48.0%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 38.8%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.12%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%).